3/7/2023 0 Comments Phonological processesUnderspecification and phoneme frequency in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 873–889. Lexicalneighborhood effects in phonetic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 433–443. The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality inword-final ambiguity. Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context onperception. Phonological context in speech perception. Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychologicalinquiry. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548–558. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. ![]() Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Computational analysis of presentday American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 971–995. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 630–645. Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 402–420. Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. Language acquisition: Speech sounds and the beginnings of phonology. ![]() The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 592–608. A., Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Meunier, C. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 144–158. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. A connectionist modelof phonological representation in speech perception. Komisarjevsky Tyler (Eds.), Spoken word recognition (pp. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. Understanding words and word recognition: Does phonology help? In W. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 299–315.įrauenfelder, U. Native-languagephonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English Itl-ldl contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 99–113.įlege, J. The perception of stop-liquid clusters in phonological fusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 104, 105–120.Ĭutting, J. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 624–636.Ĭutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 527–538.Ĭonnine, C. Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Phonological parsing in speech recognition. ![]() Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval. Expectancy and the perception of syllables. Interaction with autonomy: Multiple output models and the inadequacy of the great divide. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 588–615.īoland, J. Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 685–712.īoland, J. Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Results suggest that knowledge of the phonotactically permissible sequences in English can affect phoneme processing in multiple ways.Īltman, G. Experiment 3 examined whether vowel epenthesis, another phonological process, might also affect listeners’ perception of illegal sequences as legal by biasing them to hear a vowel between the consonants of the cluster (e.g., /talee/). In Experiment 2, Experiment 1 was repeated with the clusters occurring word medially to assess whether phonotactic rules of syllabification modulate the phonotactic effect. Experiment 1 examined whether the phonotactic context effect (Massaro & Cohen, 1983), a bias toward hearing illegal sequences (e.g., /tl/) as legal (e.g., /tr/), is more likely due to knowledge of the legal phoneme combinations in English or to a frequency effect. The perception of consonant clusters that are phonotactically illegal word initially in English (e.g., /tl/, /sr/) was investigated to determine whether listeners’ phonological knowledge of the language influences speech processing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |